You are currently browsing posts tagged “Supreme Court”

Sotomayor

July 13, 2009 // Posted in Politically Thinking (Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ) |  No Comments

    Supreme Court Nominee, sat today to begin the process of grilling that congress does before either accepting or denying a potential candidate.  As we have come to expect the two sides where devided on the candidate, like school children deciding on what color iPod they want.  The Republican sentators who are a little outnumbered (7-12), started exactly where you knew they would…the whole “wise latina woman” comments.  I had always had the image in my head, that to be a politican you needed to be a master tactician.  Instead, I only have come to see that politicans are like the people who can’t play any kind of stratagy game…I think that chutes and latters are to far adavanced stratagy game for these politicans.  Rather than dig in and find something that has been in the media since shortly after her nomination, they take the easy lazy route.  How can I trust a politican who doesn’t even hate this rival enough to dig and find more than that, they’ve gotten lazy.
    There are many stances that the republicans could have focused on, that might have made more of an impact…something like abortion.  There were several anti-abortion activists who were at the event, that attempted to shake Sonia Sotomayor up.  Yet surprising the Republicans didn’t fixate, like a dog on a bone, and go after that.  Atleast that then would have been more of a valid argument then she’s racist.  They tried the “liberal activist judge” card, but like usual that doesn’t surprise many of us.  These same people wouldn’t say sorry, your a religious conservative judge and we can’t have that in our court system.  We all know this to just be the back and forth game that they usually play and not much more…making the viewing of this boring.
    One of the few things that I would be surprised to see the republicans do to try to derail her, is ask her question reguarding her interpretation of the constitution, and would she support legislation that put 20 innoncent people in jail.  Use your own laws that you support to stangle her…because the argument is there.  Study up on some Libertarian blogs and use that to leverage herself and anyone that supports her into the corner, anything other than their current tactics.
    Sonia Sotomayor, in her opening, thanked the senators for their time with her, and how meeting with so many of them, “Our meetings have given me an illuminating tour of the fifty states and invaluable insights into the American people.”  Which leads me to think…is she that nieve.  Does she think that our representative are actually representative of the American people?  Because that’s grounds there to make me worry.  I am nothing like my elected officials…for one I work hard and don’t have alot to show for it yet. I don’t get to sit around pass laws and get paid a decent amount of money for it.  Also another thing that worried me, when she described her judicial style as “fidelity to the law”.  This is not what we should want our Supreme Court Justices to be loyal to….at least I wouldn’t.  Am I the only one who knows that the Supreme Court is suppose to act as a check to the congress?  So being loyal to the law, is a flawed outlook on the process…meaning she’ll obay the law.  Instead something she should be loyal to is liberty and justice…these are what we should expect the Supreme Court to uphold, not the law.  Lower court justices are tied to the law, because they swear to uphold and protect it…but Supreme court should be the opostie…to make sure that liberty and justice run this coutry….not laws.  This is what I think is wrong with this coutry…we’re loyal to laws…and not to freedom…the freedoms, that formed this country.

Supreme Count Bias?

June 3, 2009 // Posted in Politically Thinking (Tags: , , , , , , , ) |  No Comments

    There has been alot of talk about about the position on the supreme court that is being opened up by Justice Sutter.  There are many different takes on this position, and in the end the decision means very little.  I know there are many reasons why people may think that this particular choice is important, though I tend to disagree.  The reason the supreme court was put in place by the founding fathers was to act as a check and balance against the government.  This is a very basic action of the court, so to me liberal or conservative isn’t of real importance, the only thing that I find important is their ability to check the government.
    What I find the irony is that though there is no public vote, the politicians who the court is suppose to keep in check are the ones who let them get in.  That’s like me appointing a friend to make sure that I’m being honest.  Though this friend can never be fired, I would tend to make sure that I looked down the road and made sure they’d be on my side more than not.  This is why which party gets to choose the judge is actually very important to people, because either a liberal or conservative judge is chosen.  Now to me, a judge may not be the best choice for the court.
    I think my thought in who should be placed in the supreme court should be elaborated upon.  The job of the court is to interpret the constitution of the United States, and I tend to think judges don’t make the best person to interprete that.  The person I think who would best understand the intention of the constitution, are actually historians.  They understand the time and what the founders would have been thinking.  I can’t understand where anyone would think that a judge would understand the constitution better than someone who understand the founders.  Though I guess that’s where me and the rest of the world disagree.  I think the check and balance job is more important that the liberal vs. conservative view point.  Though if it bothered politicians enough, they would find some moderate or independent to rule from the bench.